RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01630
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Senior Airman (SrA) be
changed from 5 Mar 14 to 13 Jan 14.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She missed her promotion to SrA because the commanders support
staff failed to notify her commander that she was eligible. She
missed pay raises and the ability to progress in rank at the
first available opportunity.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in
the grade of SrA (E-4), with a DOR of 5 Mar 14.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends approval, indicating the applicant met all
eligibility criteria for promotion to SrA on 13 Jan 14. In
accordance with AFPD 36-25, Military Promotion and Demotion,
individuals must meet the following criteria for promotion to
SrA when the Primary Air Force Specialty Code (PAFSC) is a 3-
skill level, must have eight months time in grade, and be a
satisfactory participant in accordance with AFI 36-2254V1,
Reserve Personnel Participation. The individual must also be
recommended by the promotion authority. The applicants DOR to
Airman First Class was 13 May 13, eight months later (13 Jan 14)
she was eligible for SrA. Lastly, the delay was through no
fault of the applicant as evidenced by the statement of support
from the commander, provided with the applicants submission.
A complete copy of the AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.
Therefore, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as
indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to reflect that she
was promoted to the grade of Senior Airman (E-4) on 13 Jan 14,
instead of 5 Mar 14.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01630 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01630 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Apr 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFRC/A1K, dated 19 May 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01639
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. Individuals must meet the following criteria for promotion to Airman, have six months time in grade (TIG) after entering Initial Active Duty Training (IADT) and to be eligible for promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00660
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00660 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion to Staff Sergeant (E-5) be effective 1 Sept 13, instead of 1 Jan 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00301
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion effective date (PED) to the grade of airman (E-2) be changed to 21 Mar 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05229
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05229 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 22 Mar 12. The applicant would have been eligible for promotion to the grade of E-2 on 7 May 12, after completing Basic...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date in rank (DOR) to the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3) be changed to reflect his date of enlistment (DOE). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00579
On 15 Jan 13, the applicant signed DD Form 1966, Record of Military Processing Armed Forces of the United States. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They completed a careful review of all documentation regarding the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01276
However, as of Jan 14, there was no record of the Article 15 action. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM did not provide a recommendation; however, they noted the applicants request should be forwarded to the Air Force Personnel Center to have her DOR reviewed. Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 9 Feb 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01061
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01061 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank to staff sergeant (SSgt) (E-5) be restored. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...